I accept constructive comments and challenges. If you want to challenge what I've written do so. But yelling about rationalists being like a Nazi cult, and such further disconnected from reality ranting ain't an intelligent discussion. Your comment is being REJECTED!
That doesn't mean I'm not willing to discuss it:
COMMENT READS: After looking at the name calling dialog by the two attackers of Dr Holmes
Can you offer any specifics we can calmly discuss?
and their ferocious need to out him and chastise him for his work and opinions.
Hold on. There is a YouTube Channel that goes under the name of Frolly1000 - it spews slander and scientific ignorance (lies and misrepresentations) along with a load of contempt. It has to do with his politicizing climate science and scaring people out of learning about it in a serious constructive manner.
What’s wrong with outing such a malicious fraud?
Why shouldn’t we be curious about who the character is behind such a devious attack on serious honest scientists and the work they have done?
I agree with Dr.Holmes, this climate hysteria has become more of a cult or religion.