Wednesday, January 31, 2018

INDEX [March 4th] Americans for (Koch's) Prosperity - a look inside

They say life is what happens while you're busy making plans.  This past Thursday I was waylaid by the fact that Americans for Prosperity has invaded our little eastern slope Colorado town with the intention of removing a much liked County Commissioner because she shows concern for the local environment and believes the Oil Industry should take responsible for their own messes. Though she's never voted against a well permit.  She is simply too green for Koch's agenda.  Next they want to kill a long overdue and much worked on county land-use code.

Of course, I'm familiar with Americans for Prosperity on account of my climate science work, but I've always avoided focusing on them because they were too big a wormhole for me.  But, they made it personal and I figure it's important for my neighbors to have a thorough collection of information available in one place.  I'll get back to this when it settles down.  

After a weekend of research Americans for (Koch's) Prosperity.blogspot.com was created these past few days.

Since the Koch's spend millions of dollars denying fundamental climate science along with many other things, I think it's appropriate to post my index over here.  Perhaps it will be of some use to someone.

Americans for (Koch's) Prosperity Index

Recently Americans for Prosperity, the Koch front group, has invaded the Eastern slope of Colorado. This blog is dedicated to gathering and sharing information about the group's agenda and its many deceptions.

(Since much of this collection is simply sharing the work of others, I’m using the pilcrow “¶” to indicate posts that contain my own thoughts and write-ups.)

January 30, 2018
¶ Why start this blog?

January 30, 2018
Americans for Prosperity's Siren Song

January 30, 2018
Senator Reid Exposes the Radical Koch bros - 2014

January 30, 2018
Koch's Covert Operations. By Jane Mayer - 2010

January 30, 2018
Kochs in-house Political Spy Organization. Mayer, and Vogel. 2015

January 30, 2018
Koch Wins, Climate Agreement Broken. Jane Mayer - 2017

January 31, 2018
YOUTHFUEL: Americans for Prosperity, the video 2014

January 31, 2018
Freedom Partners, Funding Dirty Tricks - 2013, Politico Exposé

January 31, 2018
SourceWatch report: Americans for Prosperity, the gritty details.

January 31, 2018
¶ ’Sons of Wichita’ by Daniel Schulman, Koch bio - 2014

January 31, 2018
¶ Considering 1/29/18 Durango Herald report on Americans for Prosperity - Jonathan Romeo
http://americansforkochsprosperity.blogspot.com/2018/01/considering-durherald-report-on-afp.html
___________________________________________________________________________________________

February 2, 2018
¶ Five Myths About the Koch Brothers - Alexander Hertel-Fernandez, Theda Skocpol* - 2016

February 3, 2018
Koch's Marriage with BigTobacco - Citizens for a Sound Economy - 1993

February 3, 2018
¶ What Voters Need To Know - David Cay Johnston - 2018

February 4, 2018
Making Sense of the Koch Network - Skocpol - 2016

February 4, 2018
Overwhelming evidence, Koch Network, GOP Extremism - 2016

February 4, 2018
Koch Shadow Network Funding Dangerous Candidates - H.Nations - 2016

February 5, 2018
Koch Government? Public Citizen investigates - 2017

February 5, 2018
Koch Government? Public Citizen investigates - Appendix

February 6, 2018
Koch Government? Public Citizen investigates - Poster Session - 2017

February 10, 2018
La Plata Democratic Precinct Caucuses March 6, 2018

February 11, 2018
¶ Why the fear? From the front line.

February 12, 2018
KOCH EXPOSED - The Center for Media and Democracy Project - 2017

February 14, 2018
How Democracies Die - Levitsky and Ziblatt - 2018

February 15, 2018
¶ Scandal-Ridden Scoundrel - Charles M. Blow - 2/15/18

February 16, 2018
Decline to Sign the Gwen Lachelt Recall - Reject dirty tricks!

February 16, 2018
¶ SaveLaPlataCounty's Recall Petition Examined - dirty tricks in action.

February 17, 2018
Commissioner Lachelt Recall Is Unfair - L.T. - 2/15/18

February 18, 2018
¶ SaveLaPlataCounty's "Facts" Tainted by Koch's DarkMoney Tentacles

February 19, 2018
Koch Brothers Exposed [2014] Robert Greenwald documentary

February 24, 2018
“O the irony!” says "Save"LaPlata's front man, Peters. The irony indeed.

February 25, 2018
Kochs' Weaponized Philanthropy Machine - MapLight.org - 2018

February 25, 2018
Lachelt: Transparency regarding environmental venture - 2017

February 25, 2018
Big oil and gas behind county commissioner attacks - Ken Francis: - Nov. 17, 2017

(Since much of this collection is simply sharing the work of others, 
I’m using the pilcrow (¶) to indicate posts containing my own thoughts and write-ups.)
__________________________________________________________________________________________


Monday, January 22, 2018

Pruitt - Dr. Alley Explains Role of CO2 in Atmosphere's Evolution.


Based on the most up to date understanding, Richard Alley explains the fascinating interplay between geologic and chemical forces and how that directly influences our atmosphere's greenhouse properties and thus controls what will thrive in Earth's biosphere.

There are so many folds within folds of complexity that a talk or two doesn't do the topic justice, so I'm going to continue focusing on Deep-time and the evolution of Earth's atmosphere.  Here I present an excellent talk by Professor Alley, who earned his PhD in 1987.  Since then he’s established himself as a giant in the field of ice core studies and Paleoclimatology, having written over 240 refereed scientific publications, along with countless articles, and by now probably hundreds of engaging talks sharing his ever growing understanding with the lay public.  

This one was given at the National Academy of Sciences 152nd Annual Meeting and Symposium—Earths, Moons, Mars & Stars.  Below the fold I include notes and post many of his slides to help you fully appreciate the Professor's story.

National Academy of Science's member Richard Alley presents 
On 4.6 Billion Years of Earth’s Climate History: The Role of CO2 
Published on Jun 1, 2015

Professor Richard Alley:
“You will meet people who say, ‘we are just telling stories,’ and no we aren’t.  
We actually will generate hypotheses, that lead to new measurements, 
that lead to new samples, that are taken specifically for hypothesis testing.”    

 Dr. Alley presents the scientific process in action, 
developing an internally consistent understanding:

Sunday, January 21, 2018

Is Faith-based Thinking: God or EGO?

I've reached out to some internet acquaintances, some scientists and communicators, telling them about this new blogging effort, trying to get a little feedback.  Nothing much by way of response, these are busy people with bigger concerns filling their days, plus they come from a more establishment background.  And me, what am I, a terrified spectator, low on anyone's priority list.  Plus most simply don't understand what I'm trying do, which I shouldn't be surprised at.  In many ways they can't understand me any better than I can understand them.  Still, I try, so along with a couple other posts, I shared my list of 14 Observations regarding communication failures

One response I did receive is worth considering in more detail:
"Your section 12 Faith-Based Thinking makes absolutely no sense to me."
On reread the text it seemed straightforward enough, so I figured the main problem was with my convoluted title and I made it more concise; 

12)  Faith-based Thinking - God or EGO?

Possessing the hubris to fancy that we petty, jealous, fearful, prideful humans can access and understand the real God of Light and Time, Life and Love, leads to a profound disconnect from our planet’s physical reality, and an immoral absolutism.  

It's one thing to believe in an unknowable god, quite another to mistake one’s own hyper-inflated EGO for God. 

Unhinged from reality is not too harsh a descriptive.

I shared my change and added some explanation.

The right-wing and evangelical faithful tell us to our faces that they are in direct communication with God Almighty of Time and Light, Creation and Life.  They tell us they are doing God's duty.  For instance, it's God demanding that Government interfer with a woman's right to self-determination and to self-defense when it comes to having a child, or not - though it matters not one bit to the State what any woman does with herself.  

It's God telling people that Evolution is Satan's plan and that liberals are enemies who are going to hell.  They really and truly believe and broadcast it.  It's God telling them scientists are liars.

That is something Children of the Intellectual Enlightenment really ought to start facing up front - it demands a new sort of language and questions and open rejection of such nonsense.  

Monday, January 15, 2018

Pruitt - Explaining the science, Prof. Summerhayes.


Nothing to add.  I introduce my next expert witness. Dr. Summerhayes takes us on a tour of climate science history and explains how scientists figured out, what they figured out, and why it matters.  
__________________

Colin Summerhayes: Earth's Climate Evolution - A Geological Perspective - Earth's Climate Evolution rocks and ice as tape recorders of climate change.

You will hear this phrase used, “The climate is always changing,” - geologists particularly in the all oil industry I find are very fond of trotting out this statement.  The climates always changing as if that means that we don't have to worry about the climate changes that are taking place now, or may take place tomorrow.  ‘Ah, because the climate is always changing.’ 

To me that is what I call a mindless mantra it's a mindless measure unless you start thinking and you engage your brains and you start wondering yeah but what made the climate change, how it did, when it did.  So that's what we have to do. We have to figure out going back in the geological record what made the climate change the way it did when it did.  That’s what I’m going to talk about. (June 3, 2015)

Followed by an outline with time signature:

Grantham Imperial  |  Published on Jun 16, 2015

A Grantham Seminar by Dr Colin Summerhayes, University of Cambridge. 

Saturday, January 13, 2018

Pruitt - life and mineral co-evolution made our atmosphere, Dr. Hazen

I mentioned this talk at the end of my previous post and have decided to share the entire talk followed by notes, since (besides being fascinating) it provides more depth to our understanding of Earth's evolution - a necessary ingredient for appreciating today's geophysical processes, and their transformation over time.  Here we look at the intimate relationship between life and mineral and geological evolution.  It provides an essential prerequisite for a clear understanding of our atmosphere and the Global Heat and Moisture Distribution Engine that sustains our lives.  
Dr. Robert Hazen, Carnegie Institution for Science, Geophysical Laboratory
Published on Jul 29, 2014 - CarnegieInstitution - 57:29 minutes 
The story of Earth is a 4.5-billion-year saga of dramatic transformations, driven by physical, chemical, and—based on a fascinating growing body of evidence—biological processes. The co-evolution of life and rocks, the new paradigm that frames this lecture, unfolds in an irreversible sequence of evolutionary stages. Each stage re-sculpted our planet's surface, each introduced new planetary processes and phenomena, and each inexorably paved the way for the next. This grand and intertwined tale of Earth's living and non-living spheres is only now coming into focus.


Tuesday, January 9, 2018

Pruitt about our atmosphere. In the beginning.

At the root of Republican (and Pruitt’s) inability to understand our global climate engine and what we are doing to it, is their shallow perception of our planet.  To them our “environment” and “biosphere” are abstract concepts with the depth of a post card to their minds.

It requires a serious understanding of and appreciation for these past four and half billion years of dynamic evolution unfolding one day after another before you can hope to understand what’s happening to our atmosphere and what it promises for our future.

Here we consider very deep-time, the first four billion years of Earth’s evolution.  Earth, birth of the global ocean, fundamental geo-physical mechanisms falling into place, such as the geomagnetic field, plate tectonics, continent formations, dim sun, near moon, massive global tides, the dance between mineral evolution and primitive life, the dance between life and our evolving atmosphere.  

These are prerequisites for understanding our global heat and moisture distribution engine. 
________________________________

I start with a short video that helps put the notion of deep time into perspective.  Then a lucid introductory lecture from an excellent speaker, Professor Julie Ferguson, discussing our atmosphere’s evolving composition.

This is followed by Co-evolution of Minerals and Life | Dr Robert Hazen.  Along with some further thoughts and links to many more relevant resources written by experts and other authoritative science communicators.
___________________________________



4.6 Billion Years in the making. Our wonderful world

_______________________________________________________________

Published on Apr 3, 2014 - University of California at Irvine

ESS 5. Lec 01. The Atmosphere: Composition and Evolution of the Atmosphere
Professor Julie Ferguson, Ph.D.  -  Earth System Science

Schooling Pruitt's Red Team about our planet and its climate engine

I wrote the following column mid December for the Four Corners Free Press out of Cortez, Colorado.  Since then it seems that the GOP doesn’t think much of Pruitt’s Red team Blue team idea and his challenge appears dead.  Still as I explained at Confronting Science Contrarians I believe Pruitt’s challenge is worth exploring, if only in outline.  Beginning with an observation and a pointed question:
Pruitt, questioning the unquestionable is fine. 
Now, will you, can you, pay attention to the answers you receive? 

Science’s Blue team educates Pruitt’s GOP Red team

A rough outline for exploring the learning opportunities Pruitt's Red Team Blue Team challenge offers for exposing GOP's intellectual dishonesty.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The following column was inspired by a lecture that Kevin Trenberth  gave at Fort Lewis College in Durango, Colorado on November 9th, 2017.  Pruitt's "challenge" happened to jump into the headlines giving this story the hook that had been alluding me for weeks.  Worth noting is that most of what I write here at CSC is intended for readers up to speed on the science and the public dialogue - these columns for the FCFP force me to write for an audience preoccupied with other concerns, which produces a different sort of piece.
==========================

January 2018 - Four Corners Free Press, Cortez, Colorado


Early in December U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt told lawmakers he intended to organize a “Red team v Blue team” exercise to debate climate change science.

Pruitt is being willfully blind to the fact that the scientific aspects of global warming have already been thoroughly debated by experts. It’s expected that Pruitt will orchestrate a lawyerly winner-take-all debate. One that’s based on rhetorical trickery and a ruthless disregard for facts.

It’s a shame, since we Americans needs a constructive educational dialogue. A debate where honestly representing your opponent’s arguments and data is as important as honestly representing your own data. One where objective learning is the goal, and where truth matters.

Speaking of honestly representing the science, November 9th Dr. Kevin Trenberth (the distinguished senior scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder and a lead author for IPCC’s Scientific Assessment in 1995, 2001, and 2007, a giant in the field of climate assessment), gave a talk at the Fort Lewis College Climate Symposium explaining what scientists have learned about our planet. It sounded to me like a potential Blue team opening statement.

Since, today climate scientists and the science itself is under attack like never before it’s critical for more citizens to become aware and engaged. That’s why I want to share what Trenberth explained to us, along with some additional science. Information that makes clear what an internally consistent understanding scientists have achieved.

Trenberth underscored that pretty much all scientists agree. As for the few outliers, they are driven by other causes, such as religious and political inclinations. He explained that: “… as a whole the data are of mixed quality and length. If you were to look at one little piece of it you might be able to be skeptical that climate change is happening, but when you put it all together there's no doubt whatsoever that this is happening.”

Monday, January 1, 2018

Climate Models - Pruitt look at Red team deceptions


Republicans never acknowledge that climate models are among the most formidable and exacting challenges scientists undertake.  Then to make matters worse Republicans are consistently misrepresenting not only how climate models are used, but also doing their best to characterize them as failures, when they most certainly are not failures!

For the details on the General Circulation Model success story I’m going to hand it over to Coby Beck with the introduction to his November 20, 2006 Grist article.  After that I list significant models that have been correct.  Which is followed by links to and exerts from various informative articles.

Factcheck: Climate models have not ‘exaggerated’ global warming
Zeke Hausfather  September 21, 2017
Climate models are accurately predicting ocean and global warming
John Abraham, July 27, 2016
Climate models are even more accurate than you thought
Dana Nuccitelli, July 31,2015
The model scientist who fixed the greenhouse effect
Andy Extance - November 23, 2013
Fighting for useful climate models
Andy Extance - November 30, 2013
Why trust climate models?   It’s a matter of simple science
Scott K. Johnson - Sept 5 2013
_____________________________________________________________________

‘Climate models are unproven’  –  Actually, GCM’s have many confirmed successes under their belts
By Coby Beck on Nov 20, 2006


In 1988, James Hansen of NASA GISS fame predicted [PDF] that temperature would climb over the next 12 years, with a possible brief episode of cooling in the event of a large volcanic eruption. He made this prediction in a landmark paper and before a Senate hearing, which marked the official “coming out” to the general public of anthropogenic global warming. 

Twelve years later, he was proven remarkably correct, requiring adjustment only for the timing difference between the simulated future volcanic eruption and the actual eruption of Mount Pinatubo.